I' may be a strategic plotter but I am a tactical pantser; that is, I generally lay out a general idea of how a story should evolve and then, working at scene level, just blast out whatever the muse demands, knowing that any errors will be caught in subsequent painstaking rewrites/edits. I edit at the strategic level, moving whole scenes about or alerting the plot in non-significant ways (this ofter requires even more tactical adjustments at the scene level.) I rewrite at the scene level, usually by line edits where the turn of word dominates. That all sounds so clinical and cold but I can assure you that the execution is emotional and messy as hell.
Writing is always a struggle to find the right word, sentence, or scene. I usually have to fight my way through mistakes, wrong turns, and confusion. Throughout the process I am beset with disappointment, frustration, always filled with self-doubt, and continually worryring if the damned muse will suddenly, in the middle of something critical, decide to take a vacation. Nevertheless I plough ahead, often turning over the plot to see what might emerge from the seeds I strategically planted and if they produce a harvest worth the effort.
I often wonder if there might be a single meta-form from which any novel may be generated. It would have to start by introducing the situation and character, introduce some difficulty that fails to be reconciled, posit possible actions, only to have those fail; one after another. Developing a way to overcome opposition follows, which leads to the actual execution/solution, and dribbles off into a satisfying denouement. Emotional peaks should occur at regular intervals, as does bathos and pathos. Stitching the novel together are the principal characters wandering among interesting scenery with their spear carriers, foibles, biases, and problems. Emotional/action high points should be punctuated by adjacent calming sections .
Sure, easy to do. Nothing to it; that is if you can come up with the driving plot, intriguing characters, enticing settings, and enough material to make the entire thing INTERESTING. Piece of cake.
Which is why I write short stories.
SFWApro
Writing is always a struggle to find the right word, sentence, or scene. I usually have to fight my way through mistakes, wrong turns, and confusion. Throughout the process I am beset with disappointment, frustration, always filled with self-doubt, and continually worryring if the damned muse will suddenly, in the middle of something critical, decide to take a vacation. Nevertheless I plough ahead, often turning over the plot to see what might emerge from the seeds I strategically planted and if they produce a harvest worth the effort.
I often wonder if there might be a single meta-form from which any novel may be generated. It would have to start by introducing the situation and character, introduce some difficulty that fails to be reconciled, posit possible actions, only to have those fail; one after another. Developing a way to overcome opposition follows, which leads to the actual execution/solution, and dribbles off into a satisfying denouement. Emotional peaks should occur at regular intervals, as does bathos and pathos. Stitching the novel together are the principal characters wandering among interesting scenery with their spear carriers, foibles, biases, and problems. Emotional/action high points should be punctuated by adjacent calming sections .
Sure, easy to do. Nothing to it; that is if you can come up with the driving plot, intriguing characters, enticing settings, and enough material to make the entire thing INTERESTING. Piece of cake.
Which is why I write short stories.
SFWApro
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for reading my blog!